I realize this is getting away from the topic, but I wanted to say something following up on the last few comments (and many others elsewhere.) I am of the opinion that OBHWF was indeed JKR's intended destination from the beginning. (I think she was also variously surprised/bemused/annoyed when a substantial portion of her readership began to ship H/Hr.) I don't think she changed her mind or got pressured by fandom, nor am I fully convinced that there was a careful alchemical design that she either deviated from or, conversely, got locked into (although I do, mind you, find the alchemy discussions interesting.)
I would like to draw attention instead to the fact of her being a woman writer, as well as a new writer (when she began). In the first matter, I wonder if, as a female author, she felt the need to avoid being accused of wish fulfillment regarding her own created hero, as illustrated by the instance of Dorothy Sayers'
Harriet Vane. I have read (can't remember where) literary criticism of Sayers for writing such an autobiographical character, inserting her into the Lord Peter Wimsey series, and having them marry. (Sayers, of course, gives Vane a far greater complexity than your average Mary Sue, but Sue-ish she remains. Don't remember the details, but I seem to recall Agatha Christie facing somewhat similar criticism.) JKR has, I believe, specifically mentioned Sayers at some point; we also know from interviews that JKR acknowledges her own identity, at least to some extent, with Hermione. So my speculation is this: that she may have decided at the outset that she could not have Hermione be the hero's love interest. For one thing she was just too much a stand-in for JKR herself, and for another (the new writer part) she may have felt it would be too hard for her to pull off anyway.
But, if this is at all true, here is the maddening twist (for Harmonians): this very decision ironically
freed JKR to write Harry and Hermione as close as she wished or needed from a plot standpoint. Without sexual tension (how I hate that word in this context), freed
in her own mind from any thought of an H/Hr romantic component, JKR could then use Hermione however she wished to pull off any given scene. Are we at a point where Harry needs a hug?--go to it, Hermione. A good talking to?--Hermione, get in there. Emotional rescue--Hermione, you're on. Etc., etc., etc. I mean, others have enumerated the
huge number of incidents throughout the books of their closeness, the finishing of each others sentences, the hand-touching, the eyes meeting, the emotionally touching set-pieces like the wedding scene or the Godric's Hollow visit, ad infinitum.
Well, that's good as far as it goes, but the problem of course is that in the end you have a work of fiction in which Harry and Hermione's relationship has far more page time, events, significant moments, and just overall
impact than any other, leaving, at least some of us scratching our heads and asking, Ginny? Why does Harry want her exactly? And, Hermione and Ron?--but she's put Harry first like a million times! She's so fixated on Harry, how could she not love
him?
Okay, okay, so all love is not romantic. She's his "mother figure", you say? Or, they're like brother and sister? Err, okay, sure, whatever. Pardon me, Jo, for being left a bit nonplussed and underwhelmed.
Now about that Albus Severus name....